At the end of 2011, our company accidentally fell into the trap set by Senpu's main leaders and was falsely accused by Senpu, resulting in the company being in a passive situation for more than two years. Samp arranged and instigated others to spread rumors in an attempt to bring down our company. Given that many employees are concerned about this matter, a brief report on the situation is as follows:

1. Truth: Senpu's scheme of fraud

At that time, our company not only did not owe any payment to Senpu, but on the contrary, Senpu owed our company at least 15 million yuan.

Because the basis for Senpu's lawsuit against our company was an incorrect response from our company on October 11, 2011, which was aimed at Senpu's letter dated October 9, 2011 regarding the details of the repayment agreement. But in the letter sent by Senpu on the 9th, without any basis, our company only recorded the 175 million yuan payment to Senpu from January to October 2011 as 19 million yuan, maliciously omitting the huge amount of 156 million yuan. On April 6, 2012, during the mediation by the High Court of Hebei Province, Senpu claimed that the 156 million yuan had been included in the so-called debt owed by our company to Senpu before the end of 2010. But Senpu's own audit report for the year 2010 shows that as of December 31, 2010, Senpu's total receivables were only 56 million yuan, of which up to 55 million yuan may be related to our company. How could our company owe it 156 million yuan? Obviously, Senpu maliciously withheld 101 million yuan from our company, which is the key to the misjudgment of the Supreme Court judge. Therefore, our company has overpaid Senpu by at least 101 million yuan to 0.86 billion yuan=0.15 billion yuan (Tang Minfei, who was then our company's Deputy General Manager in charge of operations, may be involved in the case). That is to say, Senpu should refund Guohua at least 15 million yuan instead of our company owing Senpu 86 million yuan.

Senpu should owe our company more than 15 million yuan, estimated to be over 130 million yuan. Because the "Accounts Receivable Confirmation Letter" sent by Senpu to our company in 2011 showed that as of the end of 2010, Senpu owed our company 61.61 million yuan instead of 55 million yuan owed by our company.

2. Samp motivation: attempting to cover up corruption

The reason why they conspired to create false cases and defraud our company of property is to fill their corruption pit.

It has been found that from 2004 to 2010, Zhang Chunlin, along with Zhang Yongsheng, Dai Hongjun, Li Suozhu, and others, took advantage of their control over our company's financial and procurement systems and used private accounts, false contract signing, and other means to embezzle a large amount of equipment payments from our company to Senpu. Just before September 24, 2013, Zhang Yongsheng and others were found to have embezzled 150 million yuan of public funds. Among them, 44 million yuan was transferred from private accounts (Tangshan Nanxindao Branch of Commercial Bank, account number 051100104003800012123), 53 million yuan was transferred from personal accounts, and 53 million yuan was transferred from falsely signed contracts.

For example, Li Suozhu, who has been investigated by the Tangshan public security organs, privately collected 10 million yuan from Wuhai Friendship, which belongs to the Wuhai Friendship project with the sales contract number GHXM-200901 and the amount of 9267790 yuan listed in the bill of 86 million yuan owed by Senpu v. our company. On March 25, 2013, Li Suozhu led a judge from the Tangshan Intermediate Court to Wuhai Friendship Company, threatening and inducing the company's owner Wang Wanming to give false testimony in order to permanently embezzle 10 million yuan of our company's payment. The time and funds occupied by Li were all borne by Senpu Company, suspected of joint crime.

For example, on the morning of January 16th, during the trial of our company's lawsuit against Senpu for unjust enrichment of 110 million yuan in the High Court of Hebei Province, Senpu submitted 247 pieces of counterclaim evidence in court, which not only included the Wuhai Friendship project involved in Li Suozhu's illegal occupation case, which had already been investigated by the public security organs, but also involved many projects that were infringed upon by Zhang Yongsheng, Li Suozhu, Zhang Chunlin, and others. Zhang Yongsheng and others took these funds without submitting them to our company or paying them to Senpu, but Senpu sued our company for repayment.

After the corruption allegations of Zhang Yongsheng and others were exposed, they repeatedly threatened Guohua not to report the case through mobile phone text messages, messenger messages, and paper letters, and threatened that all criminal acts involving our company should be borne by the legal representative Zhao Shuyan, which indeed made our company feel anxious.

3. Latest progress: Li Suozhu has been arrested

Now, the suspect Li Suozhu has been arrested, and Zhang Yongsheng and others dare not return home. The disciplinary commission of China Light Machinery Group, the superior of Senpu's state-owned shareholders, has launched an investigation into Dai Hongjun and others; The Tangshan Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China also conducted an investigation into the judges involved in the case at the Tangshan Intermediate Court.

Hong Kong's Ta Kung Pao and other media outlets are closely following and reporting on this case.

Although Dai Hongjun and others were jumping up and down and moving around, the net was vast and unobstructed.  

I hope our employees will be more vigilant and avoid suspect such as Li Suozhu who seem to be righteous but are actually mercenary, so as not to cause unnecessary trouble to themselves and the company.

Attachment: ① Inquiry letter, Li Suozhu's "Decision on Filing", Zhang Chunlin and others' "Receipt of Case";

② Hong Kong Ta Kung Pao related reports.